TweetPsych uses two linguistic analysis algorithms (RID and LIWC) to build a psychological profile of a person based on the content of their tweets. The service analyzes your last 1000 tweets and works best on users who have posted more than 1000 updates. It also works best on accounts that are operated by a single user and use Twitter in a conversational manner, rather than simply a content distribution platform. For more information read the blog post or follow the creator Dan Zarrella

New: check out the TweetPsych Site Profiler

Click here to tweet about TweetPsych

The features displayed below are those for which you score higher than the average. The score indicates how much more often you tweeted something that matched each feature than the baseline.

Cognitive Content

Feature	Description	Score
Time		68.25
Cognitive processes	You often talk about various cognitive processes like learning, thinking, knowing, etc.	61.37
Past tense	You tend to talk about the past.	34.59
Space		31.59
Similes		29.17
Positive emotions	You express plenty of positive emotions.	22.28
Education	You often talk about school and learning.	16.53
Insight		14.04
Agreement	You're an agreeable person.	12.89
Occupation & work	You talk a lot about jobs and your work.	7.76
Motion		7.06

Primordial, Conceptual and Emotional Content

Feature	Description	Score
Abstract thought		139.47
Social behavior		122.62
Temporal References		53.79
Moral imperative		13.34
Cold sensations		11.79
Constructive behaviors		10.75
Affection		9.89

The users below are those users who are the closest match to your TweetPsych profile. As we profile more users this will get more accurate.

Some people that think like you:		Tweets	Followers
	theleggett	3177	3609	Tweet @theleggett
	cory_foy	3782	727	Tweet @cory_foy
	pauldjohnston	3430	772	Tweet @pauldjohnston
	patrickrevans	4541	1576	Tweet @patrickrevans
	keithdon	1769	990	Tweet @keithdon

Created by Dan Zarrella © 2009 (81,439 accounts analyzed)



The results presented here are for entertainment purposes only and the terms used are psychological and may not equate with their normal, english language usage