TweetPsych uses two linguistic analysis algorithms (RID and LIWC) to build a psychological profile of a person based on the content of their tweets. The service analyzes your last 1000 tweets and works best on users who have posted more than 1000 updates. It also works best on accounts that are operated by a single user and use Twitter in a conversational manner, rather than simply a content distribution platform. For more information read the blog post or follow the creator Dan Zarrella
New: check out the TweetPsych Site ProfilerClick here to tweet about TweetPsych
The features displayed below are those for which you score higher than the average. The score indicates how much more often you tweeted something that matched each feature than the baseline.
Feature | Description | Score |
Time | 173.57 | |
Space | 66.33 | |
Past tense | You tend to talk about the past. | 53.13 |
Swear | 32.54 | |
Cognitive processes | You often talk about various cognitive processes like learning, thinking, knowing, etc. | 28.96 |
Sensations | You tweet about your various senses often. | 27.25 |
Sports | 26.74 | |
Similes | 14.77 | |
Occupation & work | You talk a lot about jobs and your work. | 9.39 |
Affect | 5.44 |
Feature | Description | Score |
Temporal References | 143.7 | |
Abstract thought | 68.75 | |
Sexual fixation | 37.15 | |
Oral fixation | 28.82 | |
Moral imperative | 27.07 | |
Positive affect | 12.31 | |
Anxiety | 9.37 |
The users below are those users who are the closest match to your TweetPsych profile. As we profile more users this will get more accurate.
Some people that think like you: | Tweets | Followers | ||
craigchilds | 4818 | 1176 | Tweet @craigchilds | |
nickdebruyne | 663 | 88 | Tweet @nickdebruyne | |
jtupeck | 2977 | 217 | Tweet @jtupeck | |
garrydanger | 928 | 108 | Tweet @garrydanger | |
chrisgriffin | 3293 | 313 | Tweet @chrisgriffin |